Judgement of debate today

MOTION:
Date:		GOVERNMENT		OPPOSITION
Introduction	Pts	Name 오승민 (Oh Seungmin)		Name 오권석 (Oh Gwonseok)
Delivery	7 /10	Achieved confidence during the debate. But still not powerful.	6 /10	Reading whether than debating.
Arguments	8 /10	Quite adequate considering that this debate wasn’t prepared properly. However there were some generalizations.	8.5 /10	Rebuttal was logical. His argument was acceptable. No flaws.
Notes	Tot 15 /20	1. Students need to speak well in English and EOP helps it.	Tot 14.5 /20	Rebuttal: Do not think English skills will be improved. People do not formally in their day-to-day speech. They only use informal and low level English in daily life. It can’t improve the skills of students. Arg: EOP destroys Korean pride and neglects Korean language for Korean students. It is right for people to learn their mother tongue. Korean skills will eventually decline. KMLA wants students to be fluent in Korean, too.
Rebuttal One	Pts	Name 정다은 (Jung Daeun)	Pts	Name
Delivery	8.5 /10	Unlike the previous two, there was emotion.	7.5 /10	Not dynamic but there was tone.
Arguments	9 /10	Rebutted the LOP very well. The point was clear.	7.5 /10	Interesting but not well elaborated.
Notes	Tot 17.5 /20	Rebutt Rebuttal: If we want to learn difficult English words, we can memorize word smart. It’s casual talking skills we want to improve. We want the fluent English ability. Rebuttal: Not appropriate for developing Korean identity?? EOP is not a forcing students every time. Time is limited. Freshmen are required to take Korean History class. Even international school students are not deprived of Korean identity. Argument: School image. Helpful. Distinguishes KMLA from other high school students. We don’t practice EOP-> we become liars. As our prime minister stated, EOP helps students, and enhances school image.	Tot 15 /20	Rebuttal: 9 hours -> more than half of day when we’re awake. Argument: EOP can deteriorate human relationship. EOP helpers -> catch students using Koreans. Messes friendship. Most of teachers don’t use English -> why catch EOP??? Policy-> relationship btw teachers and students are ruined.
Rebuttal Two	Pts	Name 고지연 (Koh Jiyeon)	Pts	Name 김승찬 (Kim Seungchan)
Delivery	9.5 /10	This is it.	9 /10	Exaggerated but still good.
Arguments	9.5 /10	Very well organized. Pointed out contradiction.	7.5 /10	Quite repetitive.
Notes	Tot 19 /20	Policy -> consider a lot of things. EOP!!! Advocates all three factors what I talked about. 1)      need, 2)justification, 3)efficiency opp did not analyze status quo whatsoever. KMLA has 2 factors. International and domestic leaders. Far from English academies->school should advocate English. EOP harms Korean ability? High school. High school students already formed good Korean ability. Abolishing EOP->better ability to speak Korean??? According to opp, we speak low level. So, we speak low level Korean. Our Korean skills will not increase. CONTRADICTION!! Friendship deterioration -> uncommon. Not even possible if you follow the rules.	Tot 16.5 /20	EOP is disastrous. EOP neglects mother nature. Atmosphere that makes student think that English is most important -> wrong! EOP is like an illusion. Gap between the reality and the ideal. English only policy cannot be established fully. The image. 2nd clash. Does eop increases English skills? Gov says we can learn English skils.
Conclusion	Pts	Name 현진관 (Hyun Jinkwan)	Pts	Name 이창우 (Lee Changwoo)
Delivery	8 /10	Strong emotion but stopped too many times.	8 /10	Better than last debate.
Arguments	8 /10	Layed out well but flow stopped.	? /10	Short.
Notes	Tot 16 /20	Did not prove Korean skills decline. 2nd arg. Human relationship would decline. Could be overcome by students who support EOP.	Tot 16? /20	…..